backing1

https://bit.ly/34tXaP8 https://bit.ly/3GHQBp8 https://bit.ly/3BbTsp3 https://bit.ly/3uziBJ5 https://bit.ly/3oCmkBR https://bit.ly/3BbgkFa https://bit.ly/3gB8ify https://bit.ly/3uD8xis https://bit.ly/3gzHSL9 https://bit.ly/34lYwvr https://bit.ly/3LlVTdl

This makes absolutely no sense to me, but then neither does reducing women to domestic servants.

Grownups pull their weight.

"Pat"

by a Taken In Hand reader on 2005 May 19 - 16:54 | reply to this comment A Job for a Real Woman DeeMarie? wrote:

But maybe the "zero responsibility for wives" idea can be carried too far. At the very minimum, I would prefer that she has the responsibility to be available for sex whenever her husband demands. But maybe that's more about the husband's authority than about the wife's responsibility. Because when you come right down to it, she doesn't actually have to do much if he decides to ravish her.

My understanding is that this type of husband doesn't have to worry about his wife's "availability" - she's had plenty of leisure for building up her energy and desire. Her "responsibility" is in being *desirable* - being on her best behavior and appearance.

DeeMarie? also wrote: