https://bit.ly/3HGv7Kt https://bit.ly/33aZ4Dx https://bit.ly/3LsypTZ https://bit.ly/3rE1SCt https://bit.ly/3BaeXXs https://bit.ly/3oAP3a7 https://bit.ly/3HCITOm https://bit.ly/3uGCyOq https://bit.ly/34tXaP8 https://bit.ly/3GHQBp8 https://bit.ly/3BbTsp3 https://bit.ly/3uziBJ5 https://bit.ly/3oCmkBR https://bit.ly/3BbgkFa https://bit.ly/3gB8ify https://bit.ly/3uD8xis https://bit.ly/3gzHSL9 https://bit.ly/34lYwvr https://bit.ly/3LlVTdl Casually make the observation - when a pretext arises - that many men *do* take pride in the number and the measure of the demands and impositions that they can place on their women without effective protest from them. And then ask your prospective partner what he thinks of the women that endure such treatment and whether that's the sort of woman that he wants to marry. If you do not have an immediate, firm and heartfelt, assurance to your satisfaction on the point, waste no further time. by a Taken In Hand reader on 2005 May 19 - 20:50 | reply to this comment Mike's Girl to DeeMarie DeeMarie wrote: But maybe the “zero responsibility for wives ” idea can be carried too far. At the very minimum, I would prefer that she has the responsibility to be available for sex whenever her husband demands. But maybe that’s more about the husband’s authority than about the wife’s responsibility. Because when you come right down to it, she doesn’t actually have to do much if he decides to ravish her. In Mike’s short essay, he didn’t have the chance to expand on Dr. Pat Allen’s theories. In Pat’s world (and her jargon), the feminine energy chooses to be: receptive available to receive