backing1 のバックアップの現在との差分(No.3)

バックアップ一覧
差分を表示
ソースを表示
バックアップを表示
backing1 へ行く。
- 1 (2021-08-25 (水) 03:16:03)
- 2 (2021-08-25 (水) 03:39:17)
- 3 (2022-02-11 (金) 00:30:15)

追加された行はこの色です。
削除された行はこの色です。

https://bit.ly/3HGv7Kt
https://bit.ly/33aZ4Dx
https://bit.ly/3LsypTZ
https://bit.ly/3rE1SCt
https://bit.ly/3BaeXXs
https://bit.ly/3oAP3a7
https://bit.ly/3HCITOm
https://bit.ly/3uGCyOq
https://bit.ly/34tXaP8
https://bit.ly/3GHQBp8
https://bit.ly/3BbTsp3
https://bit.ly/3uziBJ5
https://bit.ly/3oCmkBR
https://bit.ly/3BbgkFa
https://bit.ly/3gB8ify
https://bit.ly/3uD8xis
https://bit.ly/3gzHSL9
https://bit.ly/34lYwvr
https://bit.ly/3LlVTdl

This makes absolutely no sense to me, but then neither does reducing women to domestic servants.

Grownups pull their weight.

"Pat"

by a Taken In Hand reader on 2005 May 19 - 16:54 | reply to this comment
A Job for a Real Woman
DeeMarie wrote:

But maybe the "zero responsibility for wives" idea can be carried too far. At the very minimum, I would prefer that she has the responsibility to be available for sex whenever her husband demands. But maybe that's more about the husband's authority than about the wife's responsibility. Because when you come right down to it, she doesn't actually have to do much if he decides to ravish her.

My understanding is that this type of husband doesn't have to worry about his wife's "availability" - she's had plenty of leisure for building up her energy and desire. Her "responsibility" is in being *desirable* - being on her best behavior and appearance.

DeeMarie also wrote: